Kiss Me Baby One More Time
I caught the news the other day that Britney Spear's little sister, Jamie Lynn, is pregnant. A lot of people are up in arms about her becoming pregnant at such a young age of 16. But for me, this incident highlights a much bigger health issue.
Breast cancer rates in industrialized societies are on the rise. And even though I see lots of promotions about finding a cure, I don't think the basic information about prevention is out there. The physiological function of the breasts is breastfeeding. So right there you would think there should be a connection between a women's reproductive behavior and breast cancer.
From the little research I've done, there are many factors that contribute to breast cancer. Genetic, environmental, and diet factors all play a role. But the most obvious risk factors related to reproduction should be highlighted. To reduce risks in this way, the research says a woman should:
- Start having children earlier than later
- Breastfeed as long as possible
- Have mutiple children
For example, this new study shows how the rising age of first birth for a woman contributes to breast cancer risk. And here's a good article that mentions how breast cancer was originally thought to be primarily a disease of nuns, due to their childlessness.
For ancient hunter-gatherers without birth control, women had children at a much younger age than they do now. According to this study, forager women were around 19 years old when they first gave birth. So a 16-year-old getting pregnant is not unnatural from an evolutionary standpoint (though I am certainly not recommending it).
Like everyone else, I would like to see breast cancer eliminated. But I think more people and organizations need to look at the issue through an evolutionary lens to accomplish the goal.

Comments