I got around to finishing Gary Taubes' new book this weekend. First off, it is a very well-written book, very well-researched. He examined a lot of issues in ways I haven't previously thought of.
However, I felt the concluding chapters lacked a bit of steam. Earlier in the book, he paints simple carbohydrates as the cause of obesity. Later, he drops the simple part and lumps all carbohydrates together. His main conclusion is that fat can only be fattening when there is carbohydrate around.
Curiously, he cites a lot of researchers who acknowlege that carbs drive insulin which drives fat, but disagree that carbohydrates are the villian. Instead, these researchers still feel that overall calories are to blame for obesity. Taubes paints these researchers as confused; but are all these researchers really oblivious to the proper conclusions of their own work?
I also felt the concluding chapters asked more questions than they answered. Taubes beats carbohydrates into the ground, but scarely mentions protein at the end. The carb-to-protein ratio has been shown to be very important in various studies.
He also feels that exercise is ineffective, which I disagree with. Perhaps exercise won't do much in the presence of a bad diet, but a good diet + exercise is superior to a good diet only for almost any health outcome.
Overall, I found this book to be thought-provoking, but I'm not sure what impact it will have in combating obesity. Are simple carbs (sugar and refined carbs) a major culprit in obesity? Sure, but we've known this for decades. Are all carbohydrates the central problem Taubes has pointed them out to be? No, there are traditional cultures (and some hunter-gatherer tribes) that eat a diet higher in non-refined carbs and do just fine.