Over a year ago, I wrote about how golfer Luke Donald planned to take on Tiger Woods and become the number one player in the world. At the time, Donald didn't think he had to practice any harder, he just had to "start believing." Since then, Donald has won exactly zero PGA Tour events.
Now another poser has stepped to the plate. Rory Sabbatini recently stated that Tiger is "more beatable than ever," and won last week due to some "fortuitous occasions." This is despite the fact that Sabbatini started Sunday with a one-stroke lead against Tiger, shot a 74 and lost by 4 to Tiger at the Wachovia Championship. If Tiger is so beatable, why didn't Rory beat him last week when he had the chance?
Tiger correctly stated today that he has already won three times on tour this year, the same amount of wins that Sabbatini has over his entire ten-year career. In fact, Rory has exactly one win over the past four years on the PGA Tour. Shouldn't a person have some type of credibility before they go around criticizing the number one player in the world?
Compared to Tiger's results, Sabbatini's career is a joke. The media shouldn't even print his statements because he has no substance to back them up. Anybody can talk tough, but real masters of their craft go out and perform - and let the results speak for themselves.
